logo logo
Causal effect between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in European population: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study. Cell & bioscience BACKGROUND:Observational studies have reported that gut microbiota composition is associated with metabolic syndrome. However, the causal effect of gut microbiota on metabolic syndrome has yet to be confirmed. METHODS:We performed a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study to investigate the causal effect between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in European population. Summary statistics of gut microbiota were from the largest available genome-wide association study meta-analysis (n = 13,266) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary statistics of outcome were obtained from the most comprehensive genome-wide association studies of metabolic syndrome (n = 291,107). The inverse-variance weighted method was applied as the primary method, and the robustness of the results was assessed by a series of sensitivity analyses. RESULTS:In the primary causal estimates, Actinobacteria (OR = 0.935, 95% CI = 0.878-0.996, P = 0.037), Bifidobacteriales (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Bifidobacteriaceae (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Desulfovibrio (OR = 0.920, 95% CI = 0.869-0.975, P = 0.005), and RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.882, 95% CI = 0.803-0.969, P = 0.009) may be associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while Lachnospiraceae (OR = 1.130, 95% CI = 1.016-1.257, P = 0.025), Veillonellaceae (OR = 1.055, 95% CI = 1.004-1.108, P = 0.034) and Olsenella (OR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.009-1.085, P = 0.015) may be linked to a higher risk for metabolic syndrome. Reverse MR analysis demonstrated that abundance of RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.938, 95% CI = 0.886-0.994, P = 0.030) may be downregulated by metabolic syndrome. Sensitivity analyses indicated no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy. CONCLUSIONS:Our Mendelian randomization study provided causal relationship between specific gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome, which might provide new insights into the potential pathogenic mechanisms of gut microbiota in metabolic syndrome and the assignment of effective therapeutic strategies. 10.1186/s13578-024-01232-6
A causal relationship between antioxidants, minerals and vitamins and metabolic syndrome traits: a Mendelian randomization study. Diabetology & metabolic syndrome BACKGROUND:The available evidence regarding the association of antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins with the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) traits is currently limited and inconsistent. Therefore, the purpose of this Mendelian randomization (MR) study was to investigate the potential causal relationship between genetically predicted antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins, and MetS. METHODS:In this study, we utilized genetic variation as instrumental variable (IV) to capture exposure data related to commonly consumed dietary nutrients, including antioxidants (β-carotene, lycopene, and uric acid), minerals (copper, calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, and selenium), and vitamins (folate, vitamin A, B6, B12, C, D, E, and K1). The outcomes of interest, namely MetS (n = 291,107), waist circumference (n = 462,166), hypertension (n = 463,010), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (n = 281,416), triglycerides (n = 441,016), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (n = 403,943), were assessed using pooled data obtained from the most comprehensive genome-wide association study (GWAS) available. Finally, we applied the inverse variance weighting method as the result and conducted a sensitivity analysis for further validation. RESULTS:Genetically predicted higher iron (OR = 1.070, 95% CI 1.037-1.105, P = 2.91E-05) and magnesium levels (OR = 1.130, 95% CI 1.058-1.208, P = 2.80E-04) were positively associated with increased risk of MetS. For each component of MetS, higher level of genetically predicted selenium (OR = 0.971, 95% CI 0.957-0.986, P = 1.09E-04) was negatively correlated with HDL-C levels, while vitamin K1 (OR = 1.023, 95% CI 1.012-1.033, P = 2.90E-05) was positively correlated with HDL-C levels. Moreover, genetically predicted vitamin D (OR = 0.985, 95% CI 0.978-0.992, P = 5.51E-5) had a protective effect on FBG levels. Genetically predicted iron level (OR = 1.043, 95% CI 1.022-1.064, P = 4.33E-05) had a risk effect on TG level. CONCLUSIONS:Our study provides evidence that genetically predicted some specific, but not all, antioxidants, minerals, and vitamins may be causally related to the development of MetS traits. 10.1186/s13098-023-01174-y
Thyroid Function and Metabolic Syndrome: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism CONTEXT:Thyroid function has been associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a number of observational studies but the direction of effects and the exact causal mechanism of this relationship is still unknown. OBJECTIVE:To examine genetically predicted effects of thyroid function on MetS risk and its components, and vice versa, using large-scale summary genetic association data. METHODS:We performed a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study using summary statistics from the most comprehensive genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, n = 119 715), free thyroxine (fT4, n = 49 269), MetS (n = 291 107), and components of MetS: waist circumference (n = 462 166), fasting blood glucose (n = 281 416), hypertension (n = 463 010), triglycerides (TG, n = 441 016) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C, n = 403 943). We chose the multiplicative random effects inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the main analysis. Sensitivity analysis included weighted median and mode analysis, as well as MR-Egger and Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates (CAUSE). RESULTS:Our results suggest that higher fT4 levels lower the risk of developing MetS (OR = 0.96, P = .037). Genetically predicted fT4 was also positively associated with HDL-C (β = 0.02, P = .008), while genetically predicted TSH was positively associated with TG (β = 0.01, P = .044). These effects were consistent across different MR analyses and confirmed with the CAUSE analysis. In the reverse direction MR analysis, genetically predicted HDL-C was negatively associated with TSH (β = -0.03, P = .046) in the main IVW analysis. CONCLUSION:Our study suggests that variations in normal-range thyroid function are causally associated with the diagnosis of MetS and with lipid profile, while in the reverse direction, HDL-C has a plausible causal effect on reference-range TSH levels. 10.1210/clinem/dgad371