Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies following frozen embryo transfer (FET) after transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA): A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching analysis. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics OBJECTIVE:To compare the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in patients following transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA) versus patients with normal uterine morphology, and to investigate the factors influencing pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing FET after TCRA. METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed FET cycles from September 2014 to September 2023, comparing patients with normal uterine morphology to those with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) treated with TCRA. Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for confounding factors. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of outcomes, which were visually represented in nomograms. Model performance was assessed using calibration curves, ROC curves, and DCA, with bootstrap method for internal validation. RESULTS:Post-PSM analysis showed higher live birth rates in patients with normal uterine morphology after clinical pregnancy (75.1% vs. 61.7%, P < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in clinical pregnancy rates and perinatal outcomes between the groups. Factors influencing clinical pregnancy in FET after TCRA included basal progesterone levels, endometrial thickness, parity, infertility cause, embryo stage at transfer, number and quality of embryos transferred, IUA severity, and TCRA surgical procedures. Body mass index, basal LH levels, and day 14 HCG levels post-embryo transfer were determinants of live birth outcome. CONCLUSION:FET cycles following TCRA showed a lower rate of successful live births, but TCRA did not increase adverse perinatal outcome risks. Our study introduces an innovative predictive model for clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients undergoing FET following TCRA, addressing a significant void in existing research. 10.1002/ijgo.15815

Optimal waiting period for frozen embryo transfer after hysteroscopic polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis. Frontiers in endocrinology Objective:To evaluate the optimal waiting period for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) after hysteroscopic polypectomy (HSC-P). Design:Retrospective cohort. Setting:University-affiliated hospital. Patients:All patients included in this research underwent hysteroscopy before the first FET cycle after whole embryo freezing. A total of 206 patients had undergone HSC-P, and 3681 patients without endometrial polyps were defined as the controls. Interventions:HSC-P. Main outcome measures:The HSC-P group was divided into three subgroups based on the time interval between HSC-P and the start of an FET cycle. Subgroup 1 consisted of patients who underwent FET after their next menses, subgroup 2 after two menstrual cycles, and subgroup 3 after three or more menstrual cycles. Demographics, baseline fertilization (IVF) characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes, especially perinatal outcomes after FET were compared among the groups. Results:There were 137 patients in subgroup 1, 40 in subgroup 2, and 29 in subgroup 3. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the three groups. IVF-related data and FET-related data, such as endometrial thickness and ET no. Of embryoes, were similar among the three subgroups. The three subgroups showed no significant differences in implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate. Besides, There was no significant difference in perinatal outcomes including very preterm delivery, preterm delivery, low birth weight, macrosomia, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, birth weight(g), birth-height(cm)and Apgar Scores. Conclusions:Compared with FET after their next menses, FET after two or more menstrual cycles after HSC-P does not necessarily produce superior outcomes. 10.3389/fendo.2022.986809