The Treatment of Closed Finger and Metacarpal Fractures.
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
BACKGROUND:Fractures of the fingers and metacarpal bones are the most common fracture type in the upper limb, with an incidence of 114 to 1483 per 100 000 persons per year. The clinical importance of closed finger and metacarpal fractures is often underestimated; inadequate diagnostic and therapeutic measures may result in serious harm. This review concerns the basic elements of the diagnosis and treatment of finger and metacarpal fractures. METHODS:This review of the incidence, diagnosis and treatment of finger and metacarpal fractures is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature. RESULTS:The main focus of treatment lies on restoration of hand function in consideration of the requirements of the individual patient. The currently available evidence provides little guidance to optimal treatment (level II evidence). Although most closed fractures can be managed conservatively, individualized surgical treatment is advisable in comminuted fractures and fractures with a relevant degree of torsional malposition, axis deviation, or shortening, as well as in intra-articular fractures. Minimally invasive techniques are, in principle, to be performed wherever possible, yet open surgery is sometimes needed because of fracture morphology. Postsurgical complication rates are in the range of 32-36%, with joint fusion accounting for 67-76% of the complications. 15% involve delayed fracture healing and pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSION:Individualized treatment for finger and metacarpal fractures can improve patients' outcomes, with major socioeconomic and societal benefits. Further high-quality studies evaluating the relative merits of the available treatments are needed as a guide to optimized therapy.
10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0226
Diagnostic accuracy of history taking, physical examination and imaging for phalangeal, metacarpal and carpal fractures: a systematic review update.
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
BACKGROUND:The standard diagnostic work-up for hand and wrist fractures consists of history taking, physical examination and imaging if needed, but the supporting evidence for this work-up is limited. The purpose of this study was to systematically examine the diagnostic accuracy of tests for hand and wrist fractures. METHODS:A systematic search for relevant studies was performed. Methodological quality was assessed and sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were extracted from the eligible studies. RESULTS:Of the 35 eligible studies, two described the diagnostic accuracy of history taking for hand and wrist fractures. Physical examination with or without radiological examination for diagnosing scaphoid fractures (five studies) showed Se, Sp, accuracy, PPV and NPV ranging from 15 to 100%, 13-98%, 55-73%, 14-73% and 75-100%, respectively. Physical examination with radiological examination for diagnosing other carpal bone fractures (one study) showed a Se of 100%, with the exception of the triquetrum (75%). Physical examination for diagnosing phalangeal and metacarpal fractures (one study) showed Se, Sp, accuracy, PPV and NPV ranging from 26 to 55%, 13-89%, 45-76%, 41-77% and 63-75%, respectively. Imaging modalities of scaphoid fractures showed predominantly low values for PPV and the highest values for Sp and NPV (24 studies). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), Ultrasonography (US) and Bone Scintigraphy (BS) were comparable in diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing a scaphoid fracture, with an accuracy ranging from 85 to 100%, 79-100%, 49-100% and 86-97%, respectively. Imaging for metacarpal and finger fractures showed Se, Sp, accuracy, PPV and NPV ranging from 73 to 100%, 78-100%, 70-100%, 79-100% and 70-100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Only two studies were found on the diagnostic accuracy of history taking for hand and wrist fractures in the current review. Physical examination was of moderate use for diagnosing a scaphoid fracture and of limited use for diagnosing phalangeal, metacarpal and remaining carpal fractures. MRI, CT and BS were found to be moderately accurate for the definitive diagnosis of clinically suspected carpal fractures.
10.1186/s12891-019-2988-z
METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW.
Acta ortopedica brasileira
Introduction:Metacarpal fractures are common and can be treated surgically using Kirschner wires (K-wires) or intramedullary fixation with compression screws (IMCS). Objectives:Analyze the postsurgical results from treating the metacarpal extra-articular fractures through the retrograde Kirschner wire technique, and compare it with the intramedullary compression screw fixation. Methods: Retrospective and quantitative studies were to analyze patients' medical records, and a postsurgical evaluation questionnaire was given to the patients, who were divided into K-wire and IMCS. Results:The period of immobilization with a splint took six weeks for the K-wire group and four weeks for the IMCS group. The average time for consolidation took, respectively, fifty-seven days and forty-seven days. The first group could restart their activities twenty-two days after the other, and the average force value of the treated hand, when compared with its contralateral, was 93.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Between the operated hand and its contralateral, there was a difference of 16° in the total measures of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint's range of movement among the K-wire group and 5° among the IMCS group. Conclusion:The patients who participated in this study showed excellent results after surgery, and both treatments were proven to be safe and reliable. .
10.1590/1413-785220233103e266948
Phalangeal and Metacarpal Fractures of the Hand: Preventing Stiffness.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
Fractures of the phalangeal or metacarpal bones of the hand are common. Many of these fractures are treated without surgery. However, both conservative and operative management of fractures of the hand can result in stiffness. Stiffness is the most common complication in the management of hand fractures. The key to preventing stiffness is early range of motion exercises. This article challenges many of the current treatment regimens offered to patients with the so-called unstable fractures. The evaluation of the patients' function is the primary factor that should determine the course of conservation versus operative management. X-rays do not demonstrate function and therefore act as an adjunct only to the care of the patient. The goal of treating hand fractures is to restore function. Early motion may not only improve healing but may also hasten the return to normal hand function. The tenets of how to prevent stiffness are described in this review.
10.1097/GOX.0000000000003871
Management of metacarpal fractures.
Carreño Ana,Ansari Mohammed Tahir,Malhotra Rajesh
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
The metacarpal fractures are common fractures which are treated by orthopaedic surgeons, plastic surgeons and hand surgeons equally. These are seen in young adults who have active life style. These have a major impact in life style of the patients if these are not treated adequately. The management of the fractures vary among surgeons to surgeons; two surgeons in the same centre can have a different treatment plan for a fracture. There are no standard guidelines for the treatment and it ranges from conservative management, Kirschner's wire (K-wires), plates and screws. This review article is about the management of metacarpal fractures where the commonly done procedures are reviewed.
10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.043
Metacarpal fractures.
The Journal of hand surgery, European volume
Metacarpal fractures are common and can be functionally disabling. The majority are managed non-operatively. When surgical intervention is indicated, various methods of fixation are available with the utility of each being based on injury pattern, patient function and surgeon preference. Early mobilization, especially in case of open reduction and internal fixation, is a critical component of treatment to prevent stiffness and restore function. When possible, a fixation construct that can withstand the applied forces of early postoperative motion is chosen. We provide an updated description for diagnosis, treatment options and operative fixation for metacarpal fractures.
10.1177/17531934231184119