EMG biofeedback combined with rehabilitation training may be the best physical therapy for improving upper limb motor function and relieving pain in patients with the post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Frontiers in neurology Background:Post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS), although not a life-threatening condition, may be the most distressing and disabling problem for stroke survivors. Thus, it is essential to identify effective treatment strategies. Physical therapy is used as a first-line option for treating SHS; however, it is unclear which treatment option is preferred, which creates confusion in guiding clinical practice. Our study aims to guide clinical treatment by identifying the most effective physical therapy interventions for improving clinical symptoms in patients with post-stroke SHS using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods:We conducted a systematic and comprehensive search of data from randomized controlled trials using physical therapy in patients with SHS from database inception to 1 July 2022. Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Function Scale (FMA-UE) and pain visual analog score (VAS) were used as primary and secondary outcome indicators. R (version 4.1.3) and STATA (version 16.0) software were used to analyze the data. Results:A total of 45 RCTs with 3,379 subjects were included, and the intervention efficacy of 7 physical factor therapies (PFT) combined with rehabilitation training (RT) was explored. Compared with the control group, all the PFT + RT included were of statistical benefit in improving limb motor function and pain relief. Also, our study indicated that EMG biofeedback combined with RT (BFT + RT) [the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 96.8%] might be the best choice for patients with post-stroke SHS. Conclusion:EMG biofeedback combined with rehabilitation training may be the best physical therapy for improving upper limb motor function and relieving pain in patients with post-stroke SHS according to our Bayesian network meta-analysis results. However, the above conclusions need further analysis and validation by more high-quality RCTs. Systematic review registration:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022348743. 10.3389/fneur.2022.1056156

Update on the effects of graded motor imagery and mirror therapy on complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A systematic review. Méndez-Rebolledo Guillermo,Gatica-Rojas Valeska,Torres-Cueco Rafael,Albornoz-Verdugo María,Guzmán-Muñoz Eduardo Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation Graded motor imagery (GMI) and mirror therapy (MT) is thought to improve pain in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) types 1 and 2. However, the evidence is limited and analysis are not independent between types of CRPS. The purpose of this review was to analyze the effects of GMI and MT on pain in independent groups of patients with CRPS types 1 and 2. Searches for literature published between 1990 and 2016 were conducted in databases. Randomized controlled trials that compared GMI or MT with other treatments for CRPS types 1 and 2 were included. Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were classified from moderate to high quality. The total sample was composed of 171 participants with CRPS type 1. Three studies presented GMI with 3 components and three studies only used the MT. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of sample size and the disorders that triggered CRPS type 1. There were no trials that included participants with CRPS type 2. GMI and MT can improve pain in patients with CRPS type 1; however, there is not sufficient evidence to recommend these therapies over other treatments given the small size and heterogeneity of the studied population. 10.3233/BMR-150500

Effectiveness of the physiotherapy interventions on complex regional pain syndrome in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies BACKGROUND:Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is an umbrella term for a variety of clinical presentations characterized by persistent pain usually in the hands or feet that is disproportionate to any preceding injury and characterized by many autonomic, sensory, and motor symptoms. CRPS is among the most common causes of post stroke shoulder pain in approximately 80% of stroke survivors. This study reviewed the available literature of physiotherapy treatment for CRPS following a stroke. METHODS:Two electronic databases; PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to screen the articles from 2008 to March 2021 to be included in the study. Meta-analysis was done using the RevMan version 5.4 software. Higgins I and Chi-square (Tau) statistical tests were used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS:Out of all 389 studies, only 4 RCT's were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. Mirror therapy, Laser therapy and Fluidotherapy was found to be effective than control in improving pain intensity (SMD 4.13, 95% CI 3.51 to 4.74, I2 = 99%) and functional independence (SMD 2.07, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.70, I = 100%) in patients with CRPS following stroke. CONCLUSION:This review concluded that physiotherapy interventions in the form of exercise therapy and electrotherapy has proven to be effective in treating the symptoms of CRPS following stroke. This commonest and devastating condition has not been studied to an extent in clinical settings, there is an utmost need for further studies using the available literature. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.04.040

Effects of mirror therapy on oedema, pain and functional activities in patients with poststroke shoulder-hand syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Saha Sourov,Sur Mainak,Ray Chaudhuri Gargi,Agarwal Shabnam Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy OBJECTIVES:To study the effectiveness of mirror therapy along with a Stroke rehabilitation program on oedema, pain intensity and functional activities in patients with shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS) after stroke. DESIGN:Randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS:Out-patient rehabilitation center. METHODS:Thirty-eight SHS patients after stroke, were randomly allocated into two groups; both the groups received a 4-week stroke rehabilitation program, 30 min a day for 5 days a week. Control group patients performed all the exercises of stroke rehabilitation program, while directly visualizing their both limbs. Experimental group patients performed same exercises of stroke rehabilitation program in front of the mirror. OUTCOME MEASURES:Oedema (figure-of-eight measurement method), pain intensity (0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale [0-10 NPRS]), functional activities (Functional Independence Measure [FIM]). RESULTS:After intervention, both groups showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement for all measures (oedema measurement, 0-10 NPRS and FIM). Improvements were more significant (p < 0.05) in the experimental group with mirror therapy for all three measures compared to the control group. Mean differences between groups were 1.40 cm for oedema measurement, 0.87 for NPRS score and 12.20 for FIM score. At 2-week follow-up, the improvements were sustained. CONCLUSION:The current study may indicate mirror therapy as an effective central neuromodulatory rehabilitative program to reduce pain, improves functional activities. More distinctively, this preliminary study suggests a decrease in oedema by mirror therapy for SHS after stroke. Improvement of upper limb in SHS after stroke will be more perceptible with the decrease in oedema, being the characteristic sign, following mirror therapy. Clinically, patients during their daily functional activities, shall be more confident to use their upper limb following mirror therapy after reduction in oedema along with pain. 10.1002/pri.1902