Obstructive sleep apnea in the hemodialysis population: are clinicians putting existing scientific evidence into practice?
Frontiers in nephrology
Introduction:Hemodialysis (HD) populations have a high prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), which was specifically linked with fluid overload. HD fluid management targeting a low dry weight was shown to reduce OSA severity, opening to novel therapeutic options. We assessed nephrologists' awareness of OSA diagnosis in HD patients and whether they integrate the current knowledge into their fluid management strategy. Material and methods:We performed a multicenter, cross-sectional study between July 2022 and July 2023, screening all HD patients of four HD units, and included those with confirmed OSA. We collected anthropometric parameters and fluid status from electronic dossiers. Predialysis fluid overload was measured by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance (BCM). Nephrologists were asked to identify patients with known OSA, without consulting medical dossiers. The fluid management of patients identified as "OSA positive" was compared to that of patients misclassified as "OSA negative". Results:Among 193 HD patients, 23.0% (n=45) had confirmed OSA. The mean age was 76.0 ± 7.5 years, 82.2% were men. Only 60% were correctly identified as "OSA positive" by nephrologists; 14.7% of patients on CPAP were identified. BMI was the only factor associated with correct OSA identification. The predialysis fluid overload tended to be greater in "OSA positive" patients than in the "OSA negative" patients (2.2 ± 1.4 kg vs 1.5 ± 1.3 kg; p=0.08), but there was no difference in postdialysis achievement of dry weight between the groups (residual overweight 0.2 ± 1.0 kg and 0.1 ± 0.7 kg; p= 0.672). Conclusions:Our study suggests that the application of scientific evidence to the management of OSA in dialysis patients is not systematic. However, nephrologists have attempted to strictly achieve dry weight in all patients, regardless of OSA status. Sensibilization of nephrologists on the clinical and diagnostic peculiarities of OSA in HD patients may improve OSA diagnosis and therapeutic care.
10.3389/fneph.2024.1394990
Segmental bioimpedance in pregnant end stage renal failure patient for dry weight titration and volume management (case report).
BMC nephrology
BACKGROUND:Volume assessment, dry weight titration, and blood pressure control in pregnant kidney failure patients are often challenging, with physiological fluid accumulation in the trunk and lower limbs and an increased risk of preeclampsia. We used segmental bioimpedance in the volume management of our kidney failure patient on haemodialysis. CASE PRESENTATION:We report a case of a female patient on maintenance haemodiafiltration with no residual kidney function for whom we used segmental bioimpedance to guide dry weight adjustment. At different gestational periods, we targeted a different extracellular to total body water ratio according to body segments. This allowed us to support her high-risk pregnancy, identify her as probably developing preeclampsia and trigger a plan for closer monitoring and delivery during the third trimester when she had rapid weight gain. CONCLUSION:Segmental bioimpedance is a practical, simple, and non-invasive test that can be performed at the dialysis unit and is useful as an adjunct decision-making tool in the management of pregnant dialysis patients.
10.1186/s12882-023-03360-6
Effect of bioelectrical impedance analysis-guided dry weight adjustment, in comparison to standard clinical-guided, on the sleep quality of chronic haemodialysis patients (BEDTIME study): a randomised controlled trial.
Sethakarun Sethanant,Bijaphala Sutachard,Kitiyakara Chagriya,Boongird Sarinya,Phanachet Pariya,Reutrakul Sirimon,Pirojsakul Kwanchai,Nongnuch Arkom
BMC nephrology
BACKGROUND:Sleep disturbance is common among chronic haemodialysis patients, which leads to poor quality of life, in addition to increased instances of morbidity and mortality. Hypervolemia has been linked to sleep problems observed in chronic haemodialysis patients, which suggests that optimising one's fluid status could improve the sleep quality of this patient group. In our study, we subjectively examined and objectively measured sleep parameters, using actigraphy recordings, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), in order to compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-guided and standard clinical-guided dry weight adjustment. METHODS:We randomly selected 19 chronic haemodialysis patients with subclinical hypervolemia, defined as a clinically euvolemic status, despite the ratio of extracellular water to total body water being more than 0.4 in BIA. Furthermore, these patients, who were poor sleepers (PSQI > 5), were assigned to either a BIA-guided dry weight group (BIA group) or a standard clinical-guided one (clinical group). The primary outcome was changes in sleep actigraphy parameters between the groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. Changes observed in the PSQI and ESS score between the two groups over the same period of time were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS:The mean age of the participants was 63.53 ± 11.12 years, and 42% of them were male. All sleep parameters measured by means of actigraphy were not significantly different between the two groups. Interestingly, at 3 and 6 months, the subjective sleep quality significantly improved in the BIA group, as reflected by a greater decline in the PSQI score, in comparison with the clinical group (3 months: mean difference - 1.82 [- 3.13 to - 0.51], P = 0.006; 6 months: mean difference - 3.16 [- 4.49 to - 1.83], P < 0.001). However, sleepiness assessed by the ESS was not significantly different between the groups throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS:Optimisation of the fluid status by employing BIA did not improves sleep actigraphy parameter, however, it significantly ameliorates the subjective sleep quality of chronic haemodialysis patients. This observation should be further explored in larger samples and longer clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION:This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02825589 ) on July 7, 2016.
10.1186/s12882-019-1405-z
Lung Ultrasound and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Fluid Status Assessing Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.
International journal of clinical practice
Background:Volume overload is a fatal complication for people undergoing hemodialysis. Therefore, regulating a patient's "dry weight" based on their fluid status is imperative. Clinical experiences are too subjective to accurately judge a patient's fluid status, but techniques have emerged for improved fluid control in the two decades. Specifically, lung ultrasonography (LUS) uses a unique aspect of ultrasound images, the B-lines, to evaluate extravascular lung water, which has increasingly attracted attention. However, the role of B-line quantification in predicting short-mid-term death and/or cardiovascular complications is unclear. Methods:Patients undergoing MHD at the hemodialysis center of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from October 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, were examined using LUS and a bioelectrical impedance analysis before and after dialysis, and related clinical data were collected. All patients were followed up for one year after the examination, and deaths and first cardiovascular events (e.g., stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure) during this period were recorded. Results:98 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups in relation to their mild (<16 B-lines), moderate (16-30 B-lines), or severe (>30 B-lines) hypervolemia, defined by the number of B-lines. The long-term survival rate was significantly lower in the severe group than in the mild and moderate groups. LUS and bioelectrical impedance-related parameters (e.g., extracellular water-to-water ratio) were closely related to cardiac ultrasound parameters (left ventricular ejection fraction) ( < 0.001). The optimal B-line cutoff value on LUS for predicting fluid overload (defined clinically) in patients on hemodialysis was 11.5 lines (AUC = 0.840, 95% confidence interval 0.735-0.945, < 0.001), and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were both 76.5%. During the one-year follow-up period, ten deaths and six cardiovascular events occurred. The survival rate was significantly lower in the severe group than in the mild group (log-rank test = 10.050, =0.002) but did not differ between the severe and moderate groups ( = 2.629, =0.105). Conclusion:LUS is a cheap, noninvasive, simple, and repeatable volume-monitoring method that can assist with individualized fluid volume management in patients undergoing MHD. LUS results may also help to predict the short-mid-term survival rate of patients to a certain extent.
10.1155/2024/1232211
Clinical usefulness of bioimpedance analysis for assessing volume status in patients receiving maintenance dialysis.
Park Jung Hwan,Jo Young-Il,Lee Jong-Ho
The Korean journal of internal medicine
Chronic volume overload is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and high cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing dialysis. Therefore, estimating body fluid status is important in these patients. However, most dry-weight assessments are still performed clinically, while attempts have been made to measure the volume status and dry weight of patients undergoing dialysis using bioimpedance analysis (BIA). BIA uses the electrical properties of the human body to alternate current flow and measures resistance values to estimate body water content and composition. BIA is divided into single-frequency BIA, multi-frequency BIA, and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) according to the number of frequencies used, and into whole-body and segmental BIA according to whether or not the whole body is divided into segments. Extracellular water (ECW), intracellular water, and total body water (TBW) contents can be measured with BIA. Dry weight can be estimated by measuring the volume overload of the patient through the ECW/TBW and ECW-to-body weight ratios. Other estimation methods include the normovolemia/hypervolemia slope method, a resistance-reactance (RXc) graph, overhydration measurements using a body composition monitor, and calf BIS. In this review, we will examine the principles of BIA, introduce various volume status measurement methods, and identify the optimal method for patients undergoing dialysis.
10.3904/kjim.2018.197
Effect of bioelectrical impedance technology on the prognosis of dialysis patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Renal failure
Managing patient 'dry weight' according to clinical standards has deficiencies. Research has focused on the effectiveness of using bioelectrical impedance technology for fluid management in dialysis patients. Whether bioelectrical impedance monitoring can improve dialysis patients prognoses remain controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine whether bioelectrical impedance was effective in improving dialysis patients prognoses. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (13.6 ± 9.1 months). Secondary outcomes were left ventricular mass index (LVMI), arterial stiffness assessed using Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV), and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP). Of 4,641 citations retrieved, we identified 15 eligible trials involving 2763 patients divided into experimental ( = 1386) and control ( = 1377) groups. In 14 studies with mortality data, the meta-analysis showed that bioelectrical impedance intervention reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (rate ratios [RR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51, 0.99; = .05; I2 = 1%). Subgroup analysis of patients on hemodialysis (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.42, 1.22; = .22) and peritoneal dialysis (RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35, 1.07; = .08) showed no significant mortality difference between intervention and control groups. It reduced the risk of all-cause mortality in the Asian population (RR: 0.52; = .02), and reduced NT-proBNP (mean difference [MD]: -1495.73; = 0.002; =0%) and PWV (MD: -1.55; = .01; =89%). Bioelectrical impedance intervention reduced the LVMI in hemodialysis patients (MD: -12.69; < .0001; =0%). Our analysis shows that in dialysis patients, bioelectrical impedance technology intervention could reduce, but not eliminate, the risk of all-cause mortality. Overall, this technology can improve the prognosis of dialysis patients.
10.1080/0886022X.2023.2203247
Effect of oral nutritional supplementation combined with impedance vectors for dry weight adjustment on the nutritional status, hydration status and quality of life in patients on chronic hemodialysis: A pilot study.
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Protein energy wasting frequently affect hemodialysis patients and contribute to the development of overhydration. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) combined with bioelectrical vector analysis (BIVA) on the nutritional and hydration status and the quality of life (QoL) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS:Thirty-two chronic HD patients were included in a 6-month randomized pilot study. Patients in SUPL group received a simultaneous intervention consisting of a personalized diet, 245 mL/d ONS and dry weight adjustment through BIVA. Patients in CON group received a personalized diet and dry weight adjustment by BIVA. Anthropometrical, biochemical, dietary, QoL, handgrip strength (HGS) and bioimpedance measurements were performed. Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS) was applied. RESULTS:At the end of the intervention, moderate undernutrition decreased by 43.8% in SUPL group while in CON group, severe undernutrition increased by 13% (p < 0.04 between groups). In the adjusted covariance analysis, SUPL compared to CON group, increased HGS (Δ 2.8 Kg vs Δ -1.8 Kg, p = 0.003), serum albumin (Δ 0.29 g/dL vs Δ -0.03 g/dL, p = 0.04) and serum transferrin (Δ 4.7 mg/dL vs Δ -0.7 mg/dL, p = 0.0007). The increase in QoL was significantly higher in SUPL group. Dry weight was achieved in 100% of patients in SUPL and 95% in CON group. CONCLUSIONS:ONS combined with BIVA for dry weight adjustment, improved nutritional status, QoL and achieved dry weight in HD patients.
10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.12.023
Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis and Brain Natriuretic Peptide in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in Hemodialitic Treatment.
Kidney & blood pressure research
INTRODUCTION:Setting dry weight (DW) in hemodialysis (HD) patients is still a hard issue. Several clinical, hematochemical, and instrumental parameters have been considered. In the last years, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) became the main method to evaluate body composition and water body percentage. However, it is still difficult to assess the nutritional status and identify a correct DW in HD patients. AIM:The aim of the study was to set DW and nutritional status, combining BIVA with phase angle (PhA) and serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in HD patients. METHODS:We evaluated PhA and BNP modifications before (T0), after HD section (T1), and after 60 days (T2), in all patients treated in our HD center. RESULTS:A total of 50 patients (36 males) with a mean age of 70.1 ± 8.85 years were recruited. We did not report significant changes in BNP and PhA between T0 and T1, while they were significantly different between T0 and T2. We also reported a significant difference between T0 and T2 in ECW/TBW, while we did not show significant variations in ECM/BMC between T0, T1, and T2 indicating a stability of the nutritional status. PhA, BNP, and ECW/TBW returned to a normal value in patients in which we reached a DW, also considering clinical parameters such as blood pressure and antihypertensive therapy. The weight loss obtained with the evaluation of the BIVA and the BNP was 1.2-5.7 kg, greater than that calculated empirically which stood at around 0.9-4.3 kg. CONCLUSION:We suggest to carry out BIVA with PhA combined with BNP to assess an adequate DW and evaluate a correct nutritional status in HD patients.
10.1159/000524140
Application of DSM-BIA in dry weight assessment in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
International urology and nephrology
OBJECTIVES:Dry weight assessment (DWA) is an important part of dialysis and fluid management in patients receiving renal replacement therapy. With the development of bioimpedance analysis (BIA), the development of the direct segmental multi-frequency BIA (DSM-BIA) has provided a more convenient measure for DWA of dialysis patients, but its accuracy remains unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the application of DSM-BIA in DWA of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. DESIGN:This is a cross-sectional study. Using the conventional BIA as a reference, we examined the accuracy of the DSM-BIA technique for assessing dry weight in CAPD patients and analyzed the potential factors influencing their fluid volume status. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:A total of 31 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving CAPD and 310 healthy volunteers were recruited for this study. METHODS:The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the consistency between DSM-BIA and the conventional BIA for DWA. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to explore the influencing factors associated with the edema index. RESULTS:DSM-BIA and the conventional BIA technology were consistent in DWA in CAPD patients (ICC female 0.972, ICC male 0.882, ICC total 0.960). Similarly, Bland-Altman plots showed good agreements between the two methods in DWA for both genders. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis showed both eGFR level (P = 0.04) and serum NT-pro BNP concentration (P = 0.007) were positively correlated with the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TCW). CONCLUSIONS:DSM-BIA in DWA has good accuracy in clinical applications and has potential application value for fluid volume management in CAPD patients.
10.1007/s11255-022-03281-7
Role of the new bioimpedance monitoring device (Seca) in assessing dry weight in hemodialysis patients.
Clinical and experimental nephrology
BACKGROUND:In recent years, bioimpedance analysis has come to be widely used in clinical practice for dialysis patients, but there is not sufficient consensus on its significance. We aimed to examine the merits of performing bioimpedance analysis in addition to conventional evaluation methods for dry weight such as measuring human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP), blood pressure, and cardiothoracic ratio in patients on chronic hemodialysis. METHODS:Body composition of 78 hemodialysis patients was performed by using a new and more accurate segmental multifrequency bioimpedance analysis device (Seca medical body composition analyzer 525, Seca GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany). Laboratory data including hANP at post-dialysis and demographic profile were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software. RESULTS:Mean age of the patients was 66.9 ± 12.6 years and 80.8% were males. Mean value of hANP and the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) were 61.4 ± 36.4 pg/mL and 46.1 ± 3.9%, respectively. The calculated ECW/TBW cutoff point for hANP > 50 pg/mL was 45.0%, with sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 64.7%. Patients with an ECW/TBW of more than 45% and hANP value of > 50 pg/mL had a higher blood pressure and cardiothoracic ratio on chest X-ray examination. CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggest that the ratio of extracellular water to total body water of more than 45% and hANP value of ≥ 50 pg/mL were overhydrated in chronic hemodialysis patients. Whether monitoring levels of these parameters has a role in the outcome including patients' survival and cardiovascular events requires further study.
10.1007/s10157-021-02177-7