A Preliminary Clinical Trial Comparing Split Treatments to the Face and Hand With Autologous Fat Grafting and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP): A 3D, IRB-Approved Study.
Sasaki Gordon H
Aesthetic surgery journal
BACKGROUND:Numerous methodologies have been suggested to enhance fat graft survival, but few long-term studies are available. OBJECTIVES:The authors of this institutional review board-approved study investigated the safety and efficacy of utilizing platelet-rich plasma (PRP). METHODS:Each of 10 patients received equal volumes of syringe-harvested, centrifuged fat to opposing midfaces with a lateral submuscular aponeurotic system-plication or no face lift and hands that were combined with equal volumes of either concentrated PRP or normal saline. Comparable assessments of fat retention/baseline values by 3D Vectra Analysis, VISIA, and Cortex facial skin analyses were performed. Clinical results were judged on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS:The average percent change in mean volume assessments at the fat/PRP sites from baseline values, as profiled by 3D Vectra Analysis, demonstrated a higher, but statistically nonsignificant value over 1 year than the percent value changes at the fat/normal saline sites in the opposing face or hand. Three independent evaluators were able to assess volume restorations to the malar fat pad, naso-jugal groove, and nasolabial fold as well as to intermetacarpal hollowness with reduction of visible veins and tendons in the anterior midface and hands with both treatments. No adverse events were observed over the year-long study. Perioperative edema, erythema, bruising, and tenderness lasted up to 1 to 2 weeks at most. CONCLUSIONS:Autologous fat grafting continues to be a safe and effective adjunct in facial and hand aesthetic surgery. This study will require more patients and longer follow-up periods to determine whether PRP has a potential role to increase fat graft retention in aesthetic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
10.1093/asj/sjy254
Effectiveness and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Gel with Lidocaine for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
BACKGROUND:Hyaluronic acid (HA) gel is a widely used dermal filler for the correction facial volume loss. The incorporation of lidocaine with HA provides a pain-relieving alternative for individuals considering facial rejuvenation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness and safety of HA with lidocaine (HAL) with that of HA without lidocaine for the treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs). METHODS:Studies were identified using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science from inception up to January 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected based on the inclusion criteria. Outcomes included 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and adverse events. RESULTS:A total of 908 patients from 12 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. VAS score within 30 min after injection in the HAL group was much lower than that with just HA group (MD = - 28.83, 95% CI - 36.38 to - 21.28). There was no significant difference in effectiveness between the two products 24 months post-injection (MD = 0.13, 95% CI - 0.15 to 0.41). The main adverse events, such as swelling, erythema, bruising, itching and induration, also showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS:HAL is more effective for pain relief than HA alone, but both display similar effectiveness and safety for the correction of NLFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
10.1007/s00266-018-1149-3
Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that report outcomes concerning treatment of nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, CNKI and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes included aesthetic improvement measured using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence rates of complications occurring after the procedure. At baseline, the pooled mean WSRS score was 3.23 (95% CI: 3.20-3.26). One month after the procedure, the pooled WSRS score had reached 1.79 (95% CI: 1.74-1.83). After six months it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99-2.05) and after 12 months it was 2.46 (95% CI: 2.4-2.52). One month after the procedure, the pooled GAIS score had reached 2.21 (95% CI: 2.14-2.28). After six months, it was 2.32 (95% CI: 2.26-2.37), and after 12 months, it was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12-1.42). Overall, the pooled incidence of all complications was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46-0.7). Most common included lumpiness (43%), tenderness (41%), swelling (34%) and bruising (29%). Tissue fillers used for nasolabial fold area treatment allow achieving a satisfying and sustainable improvement. Most common complications include tenderness, lumpiness, swelling, and bruising. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: "This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ."
10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5
Monophasic and Biphasic Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Esthetic Correction of Nasolabial Folds: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
BACKGROUND:Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers have become the most popular dermal fillers for esthetic nasolabial folds (NLFs) correction. Based on the cross-linking method, they can be classified as monophasic or biphasic types. OBJECTIVES:The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of monophasic HA fillers with that of biphasic HA fillers for treatment of NLFs. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Chinese databases were searched from inception to January 2021. METHODS:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared treatment outcomes of a monophasic HA filler with a biphasic HA filler for esthetic NLF correction were selected. Twenty-two RCTs with totally 1848 subjects were included to this meta-analysis. A significantly higher improvement of NLF severity score was seen for monophasic fillers than biphasic fillers at 2 (p = 0.005), 8 (p <0.0001), 12 (p = 0.03), 16 (p = 0.005), 24 (p <0.00001), 36 (p = 0.007), and 52 week (p <0.0001) after treatment. RESULTS:The effect was retained regardless of ethnicity, total injection volume, and baseline NLF severity. More subjects preferred monophasic fillers over biphasic ones (≤7 months: RR = 3.45, 95% CI 1.17 to 10.11; >7 months: RR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.86). Rate of post-injection pain was significantly lower for monophasic fillers (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.92, p <0.0001), but no statistical difference was observed for other post-injection adverse events. Compared to biphasic HA fillers, monophasic HA fillers were associated with a greater and more durable esthetic NLFs improvement, a lower rate of post-injection pain, and were favored by more patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
10.1007/s00266-021-02729-y
Correcting Nasojugal Groove with Autologous Cultured Fibroblast Injection: A Pilot Study.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
BACKGROUND:A new commercial drug that contains autologous cultured fibroblasts has been developed and approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for improving the appearance of nasolabial folds. However, the treatment requires three sessions every 3-6 weeks. It is known that the skin overlying the nasojugal groove is thinner, and the wrinkle is generally shallower than nasolabial folds. Therefore, we hypothesized that the nasojugal groove could be improved by just one treatment session. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous cultured fibroblast injection to correct nasojugal grooves. METHODS:Forty-six subjects with nasojugal grooves were enrolled in this study. They were injected with autologous cultured fibroblasts or placebo in one session. Blinded evaluators and subjects assessed the efficacy using a validated wrinkle assessment scale at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the injection. Information of adverse events was collected at each visit. RESULTS:Based on the evaluators' assessment at 24 weeks after the injection, 76% of subjects treated with autologous cultured fibroblasts showed improvement whereas 0% of subjects treated with placebo showed improvement (P < 0.0001). Based on self-assessment at 24 weeks after the injection, 72% of subjects treated with autologous cultured fibroblasts and 45% of subjects treated with placebo showed improvement (P = 0.0662). There were no serious adverse events related to autologous cultured fibroblast injection. CONCLUSIONS:Autologous cultured fibroblast injection might be effective and safe to correct nasojugal grooves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
10.1007/s00266-017-1044-3
A Two-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of and Satisfaction with Different Methods of ART FILLER® UNIVERSAL Injection for Correcting Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Individuals.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
BACKGROUND:Hyaluronic acid is the most popular dermal filler in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Injection methods vary among physicians. METHODS:A randomized, two-center, double-blind, intraindividual trial was designed to compare a new method of injecting ART FILLER® UNIVERSAL using the retaining ligament with the traditional method (linear threading and bolus injection) in moderate to severe nasolabial folds. Forty patients with moderate to severe nasolabial folds were randomized into groups A and B. Group A received injections via the traditional method on the left side and the ligament method on the right side, while group B received the reverse. Clinical efficacy and patient safety were independently assessed by a blinded evaluator, the injector, using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and the Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) at 4 weeks (before and after the touch-up injection), 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the baseline injection. RESULTS:From the perspective of the blinded evaluator, the improvements in WSRS scores from baseline did not differ significantly between the ligament method (0.73 ± 0.61) and the traditional method (0.89 ± 0.61) at week 24 (p > 0.05). The mean GAIS score at week 24 was 1.41 ± 0.49 for the traditional method and 1.32 ± 0.47 for the ligament method (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The efficacy and safety of the ligament method for the management of nasolabial folds are comparable to those of the traditional method in terms of WSRS and GAIS score improvement in the long run. The ligament method is superior to the traditional method in that it improves midface deficits with fewer adverse events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under the registration number ChiCTR2100041702.
10.1007/s00266-023-03278-2
Histologic Characterization of Polymethylmethacrylate Dermal Filler Biostimulatory Properties in Human Skin.
Ronan Stephen J,Eaton Laura,Lehman Alayne,Pilcher Brian,Erickson Christof P
Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]
BACKGROUND:Little literature exits on the mechanism of action of implanted polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) filler. OBJECTIVE:To characterize PMMA-induced dermal extracellular matrix production in the skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Single-center, open-label prospective study in healthy volunteers undergoing removal of redundant skin was injected intradermally and subdermally with PMMA dermal filler (Bellafill). Punch biopsies were harvested over a time course and evaluated for the deposition of collagen-3 and procollagen-1, proteoglycans and elastin using immunohistochemistry. Blinded histopathologic readings were performed by a dermatopathologist to characterize the nature of the dermal extracellular matrix findings. RESULTS:Normal inflammatory infiltrate was exhibited at all timepoints after PMMA injection with an influx of fibroblasts and new vasculature. Tissue proteoglycans were noted within the injectate beginning at Week 1 and persisted through the study end point. Increased collagen Type 3 was evident following the first week after injection, peaked at Month 2 and diminished through Months 3 through 6. Procollagen-1 was noted at Month 1 and continued to increase in intensity and organization through the study end point (6 months). Elastin staining was inconclusive. Polymethylmethacrylate microspheres remained within the initial injection area and became encapsulated within new collagen fibers. The growth and pattern of new connective tissue mimicked a normal wound healing response. CONCLUSION:Polymethylmethacrylate-collagen gel filler stimulates collagen-3 and procollagen-1 when injected into human skin. This combination of neocollagenesis followed by microencapsulation of PMMA microspheres in the new tissue provides for long-lasting results.
10.1097/DSS.0000000000001877
Clinical outcomes after lip injection procedures-Comparison of two hyaluronic acid gel fillers with different product properties.
Journal of cosmetic dermatology
BACKGROUND:Transient swelling is common after lip injections with hyaluronic acid (HA) based fillers. Swelling and other injection-site reactions may relate to the injection procedure itself, or to gel properties, which differ between fillers due to differences in manufacturing methods. OBJECTIVES:To evaluate safety and effectiveness of lip injections with two HA fillers manufactured using different gel technologies. METHODS:In a study sample of 40 subjects, treatment with two soft tissue filler product (HA or HA ) was randomly assigned. Subjects were injected with 0.5 cc per upper and lower lip using a standardized injection procedure. Early-onset adverse events (AEs) were assessed by evaluation up to Day 14. Aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, and AEs post-Day 14 were assessed up to 24 weeks. RESULTS:In subjects treated with HA , the intensity of early onset swelling, erythema, and pain/tenderness was lower than in subjects treated with HA . Aesthetic improvement was achieved in both groups, and most subjects were satisfied with the appearance of their lips. Treatment-related AEs post-Day 14 mostly related to the implant site; most were mild-to-moderate, and none were serious. CONCLUSIONS:The intensity of early-onset swelling, and other injection-site reactions was lower in subjects treated with HA than in subjects treated with HA . Since both the injection volume and injection procedure were standardized, the difference in local tolerability between the two HA fillers may relate to differences in gel properties. Aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, and AE profiles post-Day 14, however, were similar between filler groups.
10.1111/jocd.15548
Safety and efficacy of hyaluronic acid injectable filler in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkle: a randomized, double-blind, self-controlled clinical trial.
The Journal of dermatological treatment
INTRODUCTION:The injectable skin fillers available for soft tissue augmentation are constantly growing, providing esthetic surgeons with more options in the treatment of scars, lines, and wrinkles. Hyaluronic acid (HA)-derived injectable fillers are ideal to reduce the appearance of nasolabial folding. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of the commercially available HA filler from Maxigen Biotech Inc. (MBI-FD) in the treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs). METHODS:We analyzed 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) residues and injection force test and observed the protein content in MBI-FD, and then was cultured in fibroblast L929 cells and examined for cytotoxicity. Finally, 95 healthy participants underwent dermal filler injection therapy to evaluate the efficacy and safety for 24 and 52 weeks, respectively. RESULTS:BDDE residues in MBI-FD was <0.125 µg/mL. MBI-FD was fitted using 27- and 30-G injection needles with an average pushing force of 14.30 ± 2.07 and 36.43 ± 3.11 N, respectively. Sodium hyaluronate protein in MBI-FD was 7.19 µg/g. The cell viabilities of 1× and 0.5× MBI-FD were 83.25% ± 3.58% and 82.23% ± 1.85%, respectively, indicating MBI-FD had no cytotoxicity, and decreased NLF wrinkles with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION:MBI-FD is an effective filler for tissue augmentation of the NLFs and may be a suitable candidate as an injectable dermal filler for tissue augmentation in humans in the future.
10.1080/09546634.2023.2190829
Rhinofiller: Fat Grafting (Surgical) Versus Hyaluronic Acid (Non-Surgical).
Aesthetic plastic surgery
BACKGROUND:The author presented his experience using "fat grafting" (FG) and "hyaluronic acid" (HA) techniques in nasal remodeling. OBJECTIVES:The paper aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of FG and HA in nasal remodeling for aesthetic improvement. METHODS:A randomized controlled trial was conducted. 15 patients affected by soft defects of the dorsum, low and boxy nasal tip, and hidden columella, were treated with FG (study group-SG), comparing results with the control group (CG) (n = 17) treated with hyaluronic acid (HA). Post-operative follow-up took place at 1, 2, 4, weeks, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually. RESULTS:73.7% of SG patients showed excellent cosmetic results after 1 year compared with only 29.7% of CG patients. At one-month, major part of people who underwent the treatments (FG and HA) referred to satisfaction with the resulting volume contours (p = 0.389). 88.3% of CG patients versus 53.8% of SG described the HA and FG injection, respectively, as a very comfortable and non-invasive procedure. As expected, patient satisfaction with the appearance of nasal contouring was higher in the FG group at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS:FG and HA were safe and effective in this series of cases performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
10.1007/s00266-022-03209-7
Efficacy and Safety of Polycaprolactone in Treating Nasolabial Folds: A Prospective, Multicenter, and Randomized Controlled Trial.
Facial plastic surgery : FPS
Nasolabial folds (NLFs) are the most pronounced sign of facial aging. This study explored the efficacy and safety of polycaprolactone gel in treating Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe NLFs. Patients with moderate-to-severe NLF who wished to be treated by dermal fillers were recruited from three centers between July 2017 and September 2019. The randomizing ratio was 1:1 in the polycaprolactone group (polycaprolactone injection) or control group (sodium hyaluronate gel injection). The primary endpoint was the effectiveness rate of Wrinkle Severity Rating Score (WSRS) scores at 12 months after injection. The full-analysis set (FAS) and safety sets had 80 patients in the polycaprolactone group and control group, respectively. In the FAS, the effectiveness rate at 12 months in the polycaprolactone group was 88.8% compared with 23.8% in controls ( < 0.001). The improvement in WSRS sustained during 12 months in the polycaprolactone group, while gradually vanished in the control group since 3 months after surgery. The global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) by investigator assessments was improved, much improved, or very much improved in all patients during follow-up, while the proportion of patients with a "no change" assessment gradually increased during follow-up after 6 months in the control group. The rates of injection-related adverse event (AE) and serve injection-related AE were 8.8 versus 11.3% and 0 versus 1.3% in the polycaprolactone group and control groups, respectively. Polycaprolactone gel injection is effective and safe to treat moderate-to-severe NLFs in Chinese patients.
10.1055/a-1954-3986
A study of combination unilateral subcutaneous botulinum toxin a treatment for androgenetic alopecia.
Journal of cosmetic dermatology
OBJECTIVE:To observe the efficacy of unilateral subcutaneous injection of botulinum toxin A combined with finasteride and minoxidil in the treatment of androgenic alopecia. METHODS:Thirty-seven patients with androgenic alopecia were treated with finasteride and minoxidil as standard therapy and were randomly assigned to subcutaneous injections of botulinum toxin A in one hemisphere of the head at the beginning of a 6-month treatment. Before treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment, the patient's head hair growth was photographed and evaluated. RESULTS:After 3 and 6 months of treatment, hair density of the treated androgenic alopecia patients was higher than before treatment (p < 0.05), and the hair density of the botulinum toxin A injection side was higher than that of the control side (p < 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the response rate of botulinum toxin A combined with finasteride and minoxidil was 77.5%, with no significant side effects observed. CONCLUSION:Finasteride and minoxidil have a significant effect on androgenic alopecia, and the effect is further increased after combined with botulinum toxin A subcutaneous injection.
10.1111/jocd.15179
Safety and Efficacy of Poly-L-Lactic Acid Filler (Gana V vs. Sculptra) Injection for Correction of the Nasolabial Fold: A Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority, Randomized, Split-Face Controlled Trial.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
BACKGROUND:Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) fillers have shown excellent results as soft tissue fillers for progressive midface volume enhancement, with long-lasting results and high patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE:Herein, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of a new PLLA filler (Gana V) in comparison with those of the widely used Sculptra. METHODS:This double-blind, non-inferiority, randomized, split-face controlled trial was performed in France to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of injectable Gana V compared with those of Sculptra for correction of nasolabial fold (NLF) depression. The primary outcome was improvement in NLFs, as determined using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). This trial is an interim report of the results at 6 months. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials. gov, number NCT05215054. RESULTS:Fifty-five participants with moderate-to-severe NLFs (mean age 53.8 [standard deviation 8.7] years; 48 [87.3%]) female) were enrolled. After 6 months, Gana V showed improved WSRS score (mean difference - 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.49 to - 0.01) in intention-to-treat analysis, while Sculptra did not (mean difference - 0.20; 95% CI - 0.42 to 0.03). Furthermore, Gana V showed an acceptable 6-month effectiveness compared with Sculptra, within our defined non-inferiority margin (p = 0.1787). The immediate results by the investigator after the initial injection showed higher satisfaction in the Gana V than in the Sculptra group. Gana V and Sculptra showed no difference in adverse reactions. Similar patterns were observed in per-protocol analyses. CONCLUSIONS:Gana V is non-inferior to Sculptra with respect to the correction of NLFs and has higher investigator satisfaction. Further research is required to ensure long-term safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
10.1007/s00266-023-03600-y
Safety of infraorbital hyaluronic acid injections: Outcomes of a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials.
Journal of cosmetic dermatology
BACKGROUND:Hollowing of the infraorbital region represents a common concern among aesthetic patients. In the past decade, an increasing number of patients have resorted to noninvasive aesthetic procedures to treat these concerns. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of infraorbital hyaluronic acid injections for aesthetic rejuvenation. METHODS:Through a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials, investigators sought to answer the research question "Does the use of needle versus cannula during infraorbital HA injections result in the same incidence rate of adverse events?" The primary outcomes of interest were the incidence rates of ecchymosis and edema in subject groups treated with a needle or cannula. RESULTS:Subjects treated with needles had a statistically significant greater incidence rate of ecchymosis, compared to those treated with cannula. Conversely, subjects treated with cannula had a statistically significant greater incidence rate of edema, compared to those treated with needles. CONCLUSIONS:The incidence rates of adverse events following the administration of hyaluronic acid injections in the infraorbital region vary depending on whether a needle or cannula is used; with needles being associated with a greater risk of ecchymosis and cannulas being associated with a greater risk of edema. These findings should be discussed with patients prior to treatment consultation. Finally, as with most techniques, it is usually prudent to develop expertise with one technique before using a second, especially in cases where both approaches can be used and have different adverse event profiles.
10.1111/jocd.15925
Rejuvenating the periorbital area using platelet-rich plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Evans Adam G,Ivanic Mirjana G,Botros Mina A,Pope Rand W,Halle Briana R,Glassman Gabriella E,Genova Rafaella,Al Kassis Salam
Archives of dermatological research
Intradermal injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a non-surgical cosmetic therapy to rejuvenate the periorbital area pathologies of wrinkles, periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH), and photoaging. The past decade has seen the adoption of this novel therapy around the world. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating PRP treatment of periorbital pathologies. This is a PRISMA compliant review that includes a comprehensive search of the databases Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov. The search was performed in June 2019 to obtain all peer-reviewed articles published in English that describe the application of PRP to periorbital pathologies. A meta-analysis of patient satisfaction was performed for randomized controlled trials. Nineteen studies treating 455 patients (95% female, age range 28-60) were included. Studies were categorized based on reported outcomes: wrinkles (11 studies), POH (7 studies), and photoaging (6 studies). Patients were treated a mean of 3 times (range 1-8) in mean intervals of 23 days (range 14-56 days). Follow-up averaged 3 months (range 1-6 months). Meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) shows that patients treated with PRP have increased satisfaction above controls of saline, platelet-poor plasma, mesotherapy, and as an adjunct to laser therapy (overall effect p = 0.001, heterogeneity I = 64%). PRP treatment of periorbital area pathologies results in histologic improvements of photoaging, subjective satisfaction score increases, and blind evaluator assessments of rejuvenated skin appearance. Future studies are needed to address limitations of the current literature and should include long-term follow-up, delineation of the POH etiology that is treated, RCTs with low risk of bias, and be absent conflicts of interest or industry sponsors.Trial registration: Prospero Systematic Review Registration ID: CRD42019135968.
10.1007/s00403-020-02173-z
The Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Tear Trough Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Aesthetic plastic surgery
BACKGROUND:Hyaluronic acid (HA) injection is an effective method to correct tear trough deformity. Nevertheless, the quantitative data of cosmetic results and complications of HA injection in tear troughs remained unemployed. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the current quantitative data on the aesthetic outcomes and adverse effects of tear trough deformity correction with HA injection. METHODS:This meta-analysis consulted PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases based on the search terms published before September 2022. Data extracted was analyzed to evaluate the satisfaction rates and complications of HA injection. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model for overall and subgroup analysis. RESULTS:This meta-analysis comprised 31 reports involving 2556 participants. The pooled overall satisfaction rate was 91.0% (95% CI 84.9-95.7%). The pooled rates of swelling/edema and bruising/ecchymosis were 19.2% (95% CI 10.4-29.9%) and 18.4% (95% CI 10.1-28.4%), respectively. The pooled rates of redness/erythema, contour irregularity/lump and blue discoloration/Tyndall effect were 7.1% (95% CI 1.5-15.6%), 5.3% (95% CI 1.8-10.2%) and 0.9% (95% CI 0.0-2.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:The present meta-analysis manifested a low risk of complication rate and a high satisfaction rate in tear trough rejuvenation with HA injection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
10.1007/s00266-023-03613-7
Application of Nonsurgical Modalities in Improving Facial Aging.
International journal of dentistry
OBJECTIVE:This review aims to summarize different kinds of applications of minimally invasive surgery in improving facial aging to provide a comprehensive and accurate introduction on the issue of esthetic treatment of facial skin. . In the twentieth century, facial rejuvenation has become a new beauty trend. Facial cosmetology has entered a period of antiaging and rejuvenation therapies and microplastic surgery. The pursuit of beauty has promoted the development of minimally invasive plastic surgery. This review introduces the possible causes of facial aging and its related topics with a focus on facial injectable drugs, such as botulinum toxin, main filler materials (hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxyapatite, poly L-lactic acid, collagen, autologous fat, and polymethyl methacrylate), and some current antiwrinkle technologies, such as thread lift and radiofrequency rhytidectomy. CONCLUSIONS:Despite the difference in mechanisms of action, each technique can address facial aging involving the loss of collagen, displacement and enlargement of fat, and muscle relaxation. Combinations of these treatments can provide patients with reasonable, comprehensive, and personalized treatment plans.
10.1155/2022/8332631